The investigation was commissioned in response to complaints from some current and former UR graduate students and faculty members, who have filed a lawsuit against UR President Joel Seligman and the university's provost, Robert Clark.
- PHOTO BY RYAN WILLIAMSON
- Mary Jo White, senior chair of the law firm Debevoise & Plimpton, delivers the results of her investigation into the University of Rochester's handling of accusations against Professor Florian Jaeger
The report says investigators found no evidence of that Jaeger created a hostile work environment, as some students and faculty members have charged. It concluded that some of Jaeger's actions were inappropriate and "harmful to some in the university community" — "inappropriate, unprofessional, and offensive." But, it said, "the governing 'severe or pervasive' legal standard for hostile environment harassment is a demanding one, and we do not believe any claimant or plaintiff would be able to show that it was met as to her. "
It also says investigators found no evidence that university officials retaliated against people who had filed complaints against Jaeger, and it cites several actions — promotions of some of the faculty members involved, for instance — that investigators concluded were indications that there was no retaliation.
In a press conference following the report's release, Mary Jo White, the former US Attorney hired by the university to conduct the investigation, repeatedly noted that the investigation's conclusions are based on legal standards and the university's policies at the time of the complaints.
The report is not an exoneration of Jaeger, she said in response to a reporter's question.
A video of the press conference, which was live-streamed today, is available at www.rochester.edu/independent-investigation/.
Late this afternoon, Celeste Kidd, Jessica Cantlon, Richard Aslin, Keturah Bixby, and others who filed the lawsuit against Seligman and Clark held their own press conference, vigorously disagreeing with the report's findings. They challenged the accuracy of some of the findings and said they will introduce evidence in court that conflicts with the report.
See related PDF